November 2023
Philipp Wörz
PSG Asset Management
Fund Manager Philipp Wörz underscores the dangers in adopting a ‘business as usual’ mindset as the global investment environment shifts. He highlights the role of sound research and an appreciation of historical context when it comes to countering the recency bias, which leads investors to overweight the relevance of recent experience in their decision-making process, and which may be contributing to the concentration in positioning that we detect in many indices and portfolios. If the past is likely to be a poor predictor of future success, then investors can benefit from partnering with independent thinkers who are well positioned to find the areas of opportunity outside the popular (but increasingly challenged) and crowded areas of the market.
“ We believe an appreciation of the importance of longer-term perspectives when making decisions is invaluable. ”
Perspective is often only gained in hindsight. While many investors may not fully appreciate it, we have experienced an extraordinary period since the end of the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), marked by low inflation, low interest rates and stagnant growth. However, we believe it is probable that financial markets have been undergoing a structural inflection since 2020 and the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic, with the next decade likely to be very different to that which preceded it. However, we are concerned that, when analysing market and major investor positioning, we see a ‘business as usual’ approach that looks ill-equipped to weather a changing of the guard.
The level of US outperformance, when compared to the rest of the global equity market since the GFC, has been extraordinary. For more than a decade, the recipe for success was simple: ‘getting it right’ meant selecting the US market, and technology stocks specifically.
The immense outperformance of technology shares, in addition to exceptional business performance, was driven by an ‘easy money’, low interest rate environment that favoured long duration stocks. Furthermore, the US saw a quick recovery from the Covid-19 pandemic that boosted its economic performance. Tech-heavy US indices benefited disproportionately.
As the consensus about the recipe for success has become more entrenched, so too has manager positioning. Our investment style analysis of 350 of the largest selected global equity funds shows that most market participants have portfolios centred on positioning in large and giant market caps and close to the index, in general.
The positioning of passive indices also attests to this growing concentration: the share of the United States in the MSCI World Index is back to historically high levels. Interestingly, within the MSCI USA Index, information technology and communication services account for 37% of the index while energy and materials are less than 7%.
The concept of recency bias in behavioural finance suggests that investors tend to overweight the relevance of recent experiences, more than is objectively warranted. We believe sound, independent research and an appreciation of historical context help to counter this innate bias.
If the past is likely to be a poor predictor of future success, and if history has shown that the top performers can reverse sharply from one decade to the next, how are investors best to approach this environment, and where are the opportunities likely to be found?
Interestingly, some of the likely net beneficiaries of a changing environment – stocks outside the US – are trading at the largest valuation discount seen in decades. Many of these likely beneficiaries are also underrepresented in major indices and many popular index-hugging investment portfolios. Another important feature of today’s market structure is the valuation gap between large and smaller cap companies, which is among the widest we have seen in decades.
We believe that, rather than positioning their portfolios for the current popular narrative that sees a continued outperformance in US and technology stocks, investors need to look ahead and position their portfolios to be exposed to the beneficiaries of the changing environment. This becomes even more relevant given the significant concentration in the market in the last decade’s winners. Independent thinking is more important than ever.
By consistently applying our 3M investment process and seeking out under-appreciated quality that trades at depressed valuations in uncrowded areas, we have constructed portfolios that attempt to avoid falling prey to the temptation of clustering into what is currently popular. We believe we are well placed to uncover hidden gems that help tilt the odds of long-term success in our investors’ favour. Those already familiar with our thinking would not be surprised that we are currently finding opportunities in international equities largely outside the US and in real asset sectors, such as energy and materials.
In this edition, Head of Research Kevin Cousins scrutinises the long-standing role of US Treasuries as safe haven assets, and asks whether they will continue fulfilling this role in the future. Fund Manager Philipp Wörz highlights that many investors seem to be following a ‘business as usual’ approach that may be ill-equipped to weather a changing of the guard as the environment is probably undergoing a structural inflection. Lastly, Head of Fixed Income Lyle Sankar explains how we remain focused on managing the risk in our funds while constructing diversified portfolios that help clients achieve their income objectives.
Read moreAs we are hastening towards the end of another volatile year, investors may be forgiven for wishing a quieter and more predictable 2024 lies ahead. However, we have argued for some time that the environment is most likely in the process of undergoing a structural inflection after a prolonged period following on the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), during which imbalances grew and accumulated. The painful process of unwinding these imbalances is not proceeding smoothly, or quickly.
Read moreThe concept of ‘safe haven assets’ is a foundational concept and a well-used cornerstone for portfolio construction. Head of Research Kevin Cousins argues in the first article, Rethinking ‘safe haven’ assets, there are signs that US Treasuries may not be as well poised to fulfil this role in the future – despite having been the world’s go-to safe haven asset for several decades. Kevin highlights that investors should consider the impact of different assets acting as safe haven assets as the environment changes, and ask what this would mean for their portfolios.
Read moreIn this article Head of Fixed Income Lyle Sankar explains how we remain focused on managing the risk in our funds while constructing diversified portfolios that help clients achieve their income objectives. Lyle aims to crystallise our position on investing in South African government bonds – an emotive subject, since it touches on the management of the country, something which we are all passionate about.
Read moreStay Informed
Sign up for our newsletters and receive information on finance.